We will be offered the job and I hope we are prepared for it. And we are already at the wedding feast.
There is a discussion going on over at wheatandtares.org about the recent actions of the Ordain Women movement. As I read through the responses there, I think the question is not whether or not women should be ordained. The question is what is a christian response to the question about the ordaining of women, particularly on the part of those who believe that it should or will occur. (The question of what the christian response of those who do not, would be is a very good one too but I won't address it here.)
There is a discussion going on over at wheatandtares.org about the recent actions of the Ordain Women movement. As I read through the responses there, I think the question is not whether or not women should be ordained. The question is what is a christian response to the question about the ordaining of women, particularly on the part of those who believe that it should or will occur. (The question of what the christian response of those who do not, would be is a very good one too but I won't address it here.)
I personally believe that women in the
church should be prepared to officiate in priesthood ordinances. I
believe that some of us are prepared to do so and some of us are not.
Those of us who are not should prepare. When we will be asked to do
that officiating, I have no idea. But it's clear to me that failing
to be prepared to do so is foolish.
I also believe that celestial life is
one of full equality. “Joint heirs” with Christ means equal
amounts of everything, (including equal responsibilities and equal godly power that we call priesthood and every other good thing) if you have to quantify it, which, if you are
celestial, you probably don't need to. But none of us are celestial, yet.
I think two of Jesus' conversations
particularly apply to the current OW movement as well as many, many
other similar situations.
The first is the parable of the lord of
the vineyard who hires workers to work in his fields for the
remainder of the day. (Matthew 20) He hires them at various times,
some in the morning, at noon, in the afternoon and at the end of the
day. And then he pays every single one of them a full day's wage.
(To the great dismay of the workers who had been working since the
early morning.) Whether the worker is hired early in the day or an
hour before quitting time makes no difference in the
wages/blessing/gifts/results for the workers. And the lord of the
vineyard is the one who decides who gets hired when for that job. I
think in a situation like that the workers in the marketplace hoping
to be hired who had to wait until the afternoon or the end of the day
were probably anxious or upset or hot or concerned about unemployment
and money for themselves and/or their also-waiting workers or
something similar as the day wore on. But they did get hired and did
work, and they did receive, for that work, the same benefits from the
lord that all the other workers received.
The second is Jesus remarks to his
disciples about choosing where to sit at a feast. (Luke 14) He
tells them not to expect or head to the seats in the upper room
where the more recognized guests were seated, assuming that such is
your due. He says it is wiser to seat yourself in the lower room
and be subsequently invited to the upper than it is to insist on
sitting at the upper and be asked to move.
Both the parable and the piece of
advice fly directly in the face of what one would assume when one is
in the process of trying to attain something, be it good wages or a
seat in the upper room or anything else. But as in-efficacious and
contrary to current cultural norms as they may seem, and whether or
not you think they should apply here, I think they are what Jesus
hopes of us.